Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Hoping Mitt will clarify on oil

I have heard Mitt say that we are using "too much oil" in this country, and this is also a statement he makes on the new campiagn commercial which he will be airing in select states shortly.

I am one who would like to see him alter this statement somewhat. He ought to say "We are using too much FOREIGN oil", and/or "We are not using oil efficiently enough, our utilization of technology to capture maximal energy output from each gallon can improve."

Maybe the distinction is subtle, but I feel it is significant. Americans need to know Mitt understands and will act on the principle that until other fuel sources are devoloped, we must have an affordable and abundant flow of oil, as our economic engines as currently tooled would stop without it. That would be devastating to our economy and people would suffer and go hungry. Since a retooling will take decades, once an acceptable alternative is found, hardship must not ensue in the interim.

So in the short term, in order to achieve self-sufficiency on oil, we should dramatically increase production domstically. Mitt has alluded to that, with his support of ANWR drilling, and off the continental shelf, and off the straits of Florida, where the Cubans and the Chinese are already at it. He has also alluded to increased use of technology to capture more output from each gallon of oil used. On both these points he ought to move beyond allusion to more specifics.

He should tell Americans the truth, that we do great things with the oil we use, our economy and personal tools generate a standard of living that benefits billions of people and continues our progression in the fields of medicine, science and commerce, just to name a few. A quest to be more energy independent and to be more responsible in our efficient use of it should not be done in a way that will hinder that. Please do not ask us to drive less or travel less or not enjoy certain luxuries, that is not the way of the future and of progress.

Once again, on my issue with his use of the phrase "We are using too much oil" verses how I would like to hear him explain it, maybe the difference is subtle, but I feel it is significant. He needs to articulate that he is NOT on an Anti-oil crusade, there are others in the preidential hopeful field with those credentials, and I believe that rightfully frightens alot of Americans who are honest with themselves about the role oil currently plays in our lives, for better or worse. Its just the way everything is currently tooled. His platform of increased domestic oil production for ourselves, better utilization of the product, and advancing of other technologies in a phased in "retool" of our economic engines to those fuel sources should be better expressed than the statement he is currently putting out: "We are using too much oil".

My hope is that Mitt will get this message. As one who wants him to succeed in rightfully winning the Presidency for 8 years, this is an area I hope he will outshine his competition by correctly explaining to the public the beneficial effects of the oil we do use, how we should be self-suffient by expanding its production, more savvy with its use, and that we should participate in developing and then retooling to other fuel sources to graduallytake its place as they prove themselves more effective economically and environmentally.

I want to hear more from Mitt the educator and less from a Mitt who just uses mantras and sound bites like the rest, whom he is capable of rising above.


Blogger mitchell said...

You make some good points about our country's use of oil. I agree it would be well to emphasize the point about the need to increase effeciency.

Have you had success trying to change the blogsite to the new version?

Talk to you later.


1:59 PM, February 21, 2007  
Blogger Nivek said...

I have not yet taken the time to switch the site to the new version, as I have been justifiably busy with my wife giving birth last week to a daughter. So I will try to get to it soon. We may be coming down to Utah for a few days in June, and if so, we should get together for some lunch if you are game. Thanks for peeking in at the site here from time to time.


10:38 AM, February 22, 2007  
Blogger Rhapsidiomite said...

I understand what you mean, and it might do well to emphasize foreign oil, but I think you're missing part of the point.

I'm confident he means *all* oil consumption. His point is that we need to find alternative sources for energy, which I heartily agree with. It's entirely doable.

Remember when we thought recycling was an impossible business? It's now a multi-billion dollar business, and it has much success.

Alternative energy is possible, and I think Mitt could spearhead much progress in this area.

12:30 AM, February 24, 2007  
Blogger sink sink socks said...

It has been made clearonly that the latter emphasizes more than the former the relation nutte duesseldorf to theunconscious.But his exhibition must go on in spite of wretchedness;and he went about mechanically, talking of group sex anal gangbang curtains and candles, andmusic, and attitudes, and pauses, and emphasis, looking like asomnambulist whose eyes are open but their sense is shut, and oftensurprising those concerned by the utter unfitness of his answers.From one ortwo offices struggled the dim gleam of an early candle, by whose lightsome leck mich am arsch muschi perplexed accountant sat belated, and hunting for his error.The two boys hadsat on the same bench at Sunday-school not three hours before; yetwhat a change had come over the world for one of them since then!Hello! Where sex nylon with you goin', Ab? asked the newcomer, gruffly.

11:27 PM, March 09, 2007  
Anonymous bondage said...

Go Mitt!

Bondage refers to the use of restraints for the sexual pleasure of the parties. Bondage is usually, but not always, a sexual practice. It may be used in the context of BDSM or in its own right, as in the case of rope bondage and breast bondage or lesbian bondage.

Some couples incorporate elements of bondage into their otherwise conventional sex lives at some point in their relationships. Bedroom bondage sex games often constitute foreplay. Bedroom bondage is usually mild bondage, with one partner voluntarily being put into restraints by being tied up or cuffed, hogtied or spread-eagled, possibly blindfolded and gagged etc. by the other, who then sexually stimulates the tied partner theoretically at will by masturbation, oral sex, a vibrator or intercourse.

Some people regard bondage to be erotically stimulating or sexually arousing. Bondage sex features in some sexual fantasy scenarios. Studies of men's fantasies have shown that the fantasy of being bound during intercourse is second in frequency only to the basic fantasy of sex with a voluptuous nude woman and lesbian bondage is another very popular fantasy. Bondage themes have been present in erotica and pornography for some time.

3:43 AM, November 14, 2009  

Post a Comment

<< Home