Internet sites
I have been perusing the various sites of the current GOP and democratic presidential contenders:
www.mittromney.com
http://www.exploremccain.com/
http://www.joinrudy2008.com/
http://www.brownback.com/default.asp
http://www.teamtancredo.org/
Duncan Hunter - cant find a website on exploratory comittee or official candidacy
http://www.votehillary.org/
http://www.barackobama.com/
http://johnedwards.com/splash/
Who do you think has the best site and why? I notice that Romney is one of only a select few of the sites that actually goes into detail about issues. I would like to see even more detail given here in short order however.
I think McCain's website looks the coolest, but is one of the most devoid of substance on specific issues, second only maybe behind Obama's site which is an empty slate on any issues being presented.
On the lefty side I actually commend Edwards for being forthright on site his site about where he stands on things.
Your thoughts?
posted by Nivek at 10:48 AM
5 Comments:
Good post. Thanks for putting those website links together.
Sorry I haven't contacted you earlier. I'll send an email to your yahoo account from my new email account.
www.draftnewt.org
should be on this list
I also (independently) looked at campaign sites over at Netizens for Mitt.
I think Edwards' site is by far the best at actually communicating with visitors. Romney's is very professional, corporate almost, which I think might scare some people away.
Being detailed about the issues usually hurts, not helps, candidates. Everyone knows the American public rewards A while hoping for B. In other words, we say we want candidates who have considered the issues in depth, but we will criticize to every detail a candidate's actual plans if (s)he presents them.
Also, you should consider installing a better comment filter to avoid spam comments like the one from 'sink sink socks' above.
here are a couple of good ones as well..
Bondage refers to the use of restraints for the sexual pleasure of the parties. Bondage is usually, but not always, a sexual practice. It may be used in the context of BDSM or in its own right, as in the case of rope bondage and breast bondage or lesbian bondage.
Some couples incorporate elements of bondage into their otherwise conventional sex lives at some point in their relationships. Bedroom bondage sex games often constitute foreplay. Bedroom bondage is usually mild bondage, with one partner voluntarily being put into restraints by being tied up or cuffed, hogtied or spread-eagled, possibly blindfolded and gagged etc. by the other, who then sexually stimulates the tied partner theoretically at will by masturbation, oral sex, a vibrator or intercourse.
Some people regard bondage to be erotically stimulating or sexually arousing. Bondage sex features in some sexual fantasy scenarios. Studies of men's fantasies have shown that the fantasy of being bound during intercourse is second in frequency only to the basic fantasy of sex with a voluptuous nude woman and lesbian bondage is another very popular fantasy. Bondage themes have been present in erotica and pornography for some time.
Post a Comment
<< Home